[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On what is helpful and what is not [was: Re: Wifi]



On 03/10/2014 10:47 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2014 14:34:43 Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
It's pretty damn sad that a 'certain' type of new users join this
list, and the first post they see from me is one of my rare tough
love posts such as in this thread.  And even though said new
users are not the recipient of the comment, they nonetheless
instantly overreact, blow their top, and try to rally the list to
tackle "the bully".  What thoughtful people do is create mail
filters, without uttering a peep on or off list.

         Nah, I haven't gotten anywhere close to "blowing my top".
And I'm not trying to rally anyone.

If the cap fits??  Your name wasn't mentioned! Tho' I agree that it is
not too difficult sometimes to know if one was meant.

:) True, point taken. He did say it was not directed at any one person; but given the way he wrote it, it certainly came across as directed for me.

Stan may be abrasive, as he would be the first to admit.  But he is
very knowledgeable and very ready to use this knowledge to help
others.  If he upsets you as much as he appears to do, why don't you
just null-file him?

He didn't upset me that much; just irritated at his less than friendly response. It's attitudes like that that keep people away from Debian & Linux. As for ignoring his messages, that is a catch-22. I can't knock his knowledge (seems he does know Debian very well, and I have no idea on the rest of his resume); and if I'm following a thread that he responds to; it'd be irritating to have a hole in the conversation.


--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
Registered Linux user number 464583

"Computers have lots of memory but no imagination."
"The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back."
- from some guy on the internet.


Reply to: