On Sb, 25 ian 14, 11:16:45, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote: > Le 25.01.2014 07:02, Zenaan Harkness a écrit : > > >I hear rumours that with a modern PeeCee with fast graphics card, > >running a compositing "3D" window manager can be higher performance > >than our old window managers, since the compositing and window moving > >etc all occurs on the card, not through the CPU - so that could > >actually be a "lighter weight" option for a modern pc... > > Those are simply rumors. People saying so have never used a tiling > window manager, how could they determine the faster way to manage > windows? Those GPU-accelerated softwares are better than others, if > you want beautiful corners, transparency, fire effects and other > useless ( well, those can be useful if you need to sell some crap to > someone else, or to prove that your favorite distro is far more > advanced in eye-candy stuff than windows ) stuff, but for real use, > do you need those "features" ? I think the point was about use of computer resources, not about the ways humans interact with the window manager, which is very subjective. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature