Re: testing wants to install systemd
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 20:11 +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:11:04PM +0000, Brian wrote:
> > In what way does such an extended discussion "perfectly" answer the OP's
> > question,oespecially when some of the responses imply bad faith on the
> > part of the OP and a developer of some linux software? Mails such as
> > those do not reflect well on the purpose or status of -user.
>
> I couldn't agree more. I note that some of these (at best) unhelpful and
> (at worst) objectionable responses are from the very person suggesting
> the discussion is moved to the offtopic list.
>
> I have no problem with long-winded, unhelpful threads on offtopic, but
> I do object to the suggestion that those of us who *do* want to be
> helpful are prevented from doing so when the question being asked is
> in an area that others find controversial.
JFTR my first post was "Are you sure that it is installed to replace
init? Perhaps systemd isn't used, but needed as a hard dependency?
[...]" and I guess it's solved since seemingly gnome-settings-daemon is
the culprit. So IMO this discussion is ok, but moving it to off-topic
IMO is still useful.
Reply to: