[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SOLVED] Multiple dpkg warning (non-empty directories) during upgrade to wheezy



On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Reco wrote:

On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:27:57 +0200 (IST)
Itay <debian@itayf.fastmail.fm> wrote:

Thanks for helping me out on this, too.
Using your advice I was able to further clean-up.

I was left with two puzzling cases in which an orphan directory
contains dpkg'ed files.

1. /etc/openoffice

# dpkg -S /etc/openoffice
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/openoffice
# for f in /etc/openoffice/*; do dpkg -S $f; done
openoffice.org-common: /etc/openoffice/psprint.conf
openoffice.org-common: /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh
openoffice.org-common: /etc/openoffice/sofficerc

(There was an orphan file /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst.old, which I
removed.)

aptitude search '~o'

will show you all packages that were in squeeze, but are removed from
Debian repository in wheezy. Everything in that list can be removed
more or less safely.
Given that openoffice was replaced with libreoffice in wheezy that's
probably the case.

I did clean up all the obsolete packages (except for one).
openoffice.org-common was marked as deleted, but not purged.
I should have thought about this myself.  Sorry.

2. /etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour

# ddir=/etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour
# dpkg -S $ddir; for f in $ddir/*; do dpkg -S $f; done; unset f
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour
texlive-latex-extra: /etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour/contour.cfg

Questions:
A. Is this an acceptable state?
B. Is this a bug?

Maybe. I'm not that familiar with LaTeX.
Still, if file belongs to the package, and directory in which the file
resides is not, that's probably ok.

I deem this is a low-priority issue, if a problem at all.

Thanks for the help!
Itay


Reco





Reply to: