Re: Installing Cinnamon 2.0
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 14:05 +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb
> 403 Forbidden'
Try
http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb instead [1].
Regards,
Ralf
PS: [2]
[1]
$ wget
http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb
--2013-10-12 16:34:59--
http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb
Resolving http.debian.net (http.debian.net)... 46.4.205.44,
2a01:4f8:131:152c::42
Connecting to http.debian.net (http.debian.net)|46.4.205.44|:80...
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
Location:
http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb [following]
--2013-10-12 16:34:59--
http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/pool/main/g/gobby-infinote/gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb
Resolving debian.netcologne.de (debian.netcologne.de)... 194.8.197.22,
2001:4dd0:1234:1::deb
Connecting to debian.netcologne.de (debian.netcologne.de)|
194.8.197.22|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 523694 (511K) [application/x-debian-package]
Saving to: ‘gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb’
100%[=======================================================================>] 523,694 593KB/s in 0.9s
2013-10-12 16:35:00 (593 KB/s) - ‘gobby-0.5_0.4.94-5.1_i386.deb’ saved
[523694/523694]
[2]
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 08:51 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> You're installing from an unofficial repository and complaining about
> conflicts. Good one! [snip]
> You really have no clue how distributions are run, do you? [snip]
You misunderstand, this is my argumentation. Maintaining Mate packages
for official repositories is a hard job, regarding to issues caused by
upstream. Because I know how some distributions work, there is my
argumentation about issues with upstream that can't be solved by a
council.
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 14:47 +0200, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 12.10.2013 14:04, Mark Allums a écrit :
> > The point of mentioning MATE was in context with adding MATE to
> > Debian. Our point was, there are only minor problems with that
> > happening, and they should be solvable fairly easily within a short
> > period of time
>
> > (i.e., in the time between releases of Stable).
>
> If it was so easy, then I can only guess that MATE's users
> finally do not care that much to have it into official repo, and
> should accept that other people uses that as an argument that it
> *might* give problems. Because, yes, 3rd party repo are possible, but
> are not supported by Debian
or any other major distro, +1.
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 08:42 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> I can't develop for MATE, it's not part of my skill set. I will
> encourage other people to get involved, that much, I can do.
You can learn and become a package maintainer, you don't need to become
a Mate developer.
Reply to: