Re: wheezy irqbalance

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: wheezy irqbalance
From: Guy Marcenac <guy@posteurs.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 11:07:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 518F5BE3.8040806@posteurs.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 518CBE91.9080809@hardwarefreak.com>
References: <[🔎] 518B8309.5090802@posteurs.com> <[🔎] 518BBEE3.1090503@hardwarefreak.com> <[🔎] 518BC219.1080305@hardwarefreak.com> <[🔎] 518CB234.9050100@posteurs.com> <[🔎] 518CBE91.9080809@hardwarefreak.com>

Hello Stan,

Thx for this very clear explanation.
I am now sure my so small server do not require irqbalance.

--
Guy

Reply to:

References:
- wheezy irqbalance
  - From: Guy Marcenac <guy@posteurs.com>
- Re: wheezy irqbalance
  - From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Re: wheezy irqbalance
  - From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
- Re: wheezy irqbalance
  - From: Guy Marcenac <guy@posteurs.com>
- Re: wheezy irqbalance
  - From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>

Prev by Date: Re: how to avoid download during debian installation.
Next by Date: Re: Bug in audio recently
Previous by thread: Re: wheezy irqbalance
Next by thread: problems with bridge name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread