Re: [OT] Intelectual Property Law
On 8/8/12, Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:01:40 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 21:29 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>> > I can also say that any private ownership of property is monopolistic,
>> > since it gives the owner a monopoly on the use of some particular
>> > piece of property.
>>
>> Since I didn't follow the whole thread: Are you aware that somebody's
>> intelectual property could be the ownership of somebody else?
>
> Not quite sure what you're saying here.
>
>> If you're on work and you've got the idea how to improve something
>> regarding to your job, than you're the copyright holder (it's your
>> intelectual property), but you're not the owner. At least not for
>> averaged employment agreements in Germany.
>>
>> http://www.dict.cc/?s=ownership
>> http://www.dict.cc/?s=property
>>
>> Language barriers already make it difficult to understand for humans
>> with different native languages. In our native languages we have anyway
>> some kind of secret languages.
>
> I do think we may have a language barrier here.
Two people, one wants a monopoly, the other does not.
Instant language barrier.
--
Joel Rees
Reply to: