[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Intelectual Property Law

On 8/8/12, Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:01:40 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 21:29 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>> > I can also say that any private ownership of property is monopolistic,
>> > since it gives the owner a monopoly on the use of some particular
>> > piece of property.
>> Since I didn't follow the whole thread: Are you aware that somebody's
>> intelectual property could be the ownership of somebody else?
> Not quite sure what you're saying here.
>> If you're on work and you've got the idea how to improve something
>> regarding to your job, than you're the copyright holder (it's your
>> intelectual property), but you're not the owner. At least not for
>> averaged employment agreements in Germany.
>> http://www.dict.cc/?s=ownership
>> http://www.dict.cc/?s=property
>> Language barriers already make it difficult to understand for humans
>> with different native languages. In our native languages we have anyway
>> some kind of secret languages.
> I do think we may have a language barrier here.

Two people, one wants a monopoly, the other does not.

Instant language barrier.

Joel Rees

Reply to: