Re: [OT] Posting styles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Claudius Hubig <debian_1203@chubig.net> wrote:
>Hello Mika,
>
>Mika Suomalainen <mika.henrik.mainio@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you for providing explaining to bottom post. I have now
>> configured Icedove and K9 Mail to do bottom posting instead of top
>> posting.
>
>Just to do some more nitpicking: You should also remove everything
>you are not referring to.
>
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>And is there a specific reason you prefer PGP/Inline over PGP/Mime?
>The latter avoids these ugly chunks of code at the end of the
>displayed message.
>
>And once messages are trimmed like this, they’re even readable on
>mobile phones :-)
>
>Best regards,
>
>Claudius
>--
>Logic is the chastity belt of the mind!
>Please use GPG: ECB0C2C7 4A4C4046 446ADF86 C08112E5 D72CDBA4
>http://chubig.net telnet://nightfall.org:4242
Hi Cladius,
I think that I understand now.
Yes, there are reasons why I prefer GPG inline to s/mime.
1. K9 Maill can only verify inline signatures.
2. Inline signature is easier to verify when reading mailing list archives.
3. Inline spams people who do not use gpg compatible email client :P
PS. This is email is sent from my phone.
Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
> Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
>> NOTE: The old key (62FE66853913CB03) expires on 03.04.2012!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8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=f9IX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: