Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
From: Geronimo <geronimo013@arcor.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:44:08 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201103251644.09051.geronimo013@arcor.de>
Reply-to: geronimo013@arcor.de
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110325152507.GX12860@wasteland.homelinux.net>
References: <[🔎] 201103211259.03018.geronimo013@arcor.de> <[🔎] 201103251504.06552.geronimo013@arcor.de> <[🔎] 20110325152507.GX12860@wasteland.homelinux.net>

Hello,

Jochen Schulz wrote:
> ACK, it's probably another issue. But you may still want to refer to
> this bug number in your new report. 

Done.

Reply to:

References:
- What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
  - From: Geronimo <geronimo013@arcor.de>
- Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
  - From: Geronimo <geronimo013@arcor.de>
- Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
  - From: Jochen Schulz <ml@well-adjusted.de>

Prev by Date: "Modes" versus "Virtual" in xorg.conf
Next by Date: wheezy repository ???
Previous by thread: Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
Next by thread: Re: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread