[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgrade to 2.6.32-5-amd64 failing miserably

also sprach lrhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com> [2011.02.02.2047 +0100]:
> ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid6 num-devices=10 metadata=01.2 name=Backup:0
> UUID=431244d6:45d9635a:e88b3de5:92f30255

What's metadata=01.2. I suggest you remove the 0, except for this
one line:

> ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 metadata=0.90
> UUID=4cde286c:0687556a:4d9996dd:dd23e701

> > And what does /proc/mdstat contain at this point.
>         Before I stop and re-start the arrays, all four show
>         inactive.

Are they degraded?

Also, judging from your dmesg output, you *do* have hardware

Also, what version of mdadm are you using? Which package?

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"... (ethik und ästhetik sind eins.)"
                                                       -- wittgenstein

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply to: