[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SMART configuration



T o n g wrote:
> but that setting was overwritten by new smart updates. Now I think it is 
> still OK, and I'll set it back.

There are a few differing schools of thought about conffiles.  One is
to put as little as possible into them so that they never change in
the package and then the user never need to merge changes.  Whatever
the user has, sticks.

But then some other users object that they want lots of commented
examples that they can just uncomment and so other maintainers go the
other way packaging a file with loads of comments.  The problem there
is that when the comments change it means a conffile update even
though no actual content changed.  I find this latter problem
annoying.

I now just suffer through changes like those, like the recent one to
schroot with comment only changes to the schroot.conf file, that
required me to merge my local configuration into it.  I could refuse
the update since there was no actual content change but then my copy
of the file would diverge more and more over time.  So I just force
myself through it every time now.  Sigh.

Bob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: