Re: ls has stopped using the ISO date format
* On 2010 31 May 04:39 -0500, Camaleón wrote:
> Worst is that, inside my company, there are people still using just two
> digits for the year, something like "31/05/10" (it reads 31st May, 2010).
> Woow, sir, for sure is confusing (I ask them, "hey, what will happen in
> year 3010? >:-)") and that is the reason I prefer to use a standardized
> format even does not match the usual form I was used to.
No need to wait that long. 2110 will come along soon enough to make two
digit year notation ambiguous again.
The good thing about this thread is that it caused me to reaquaint
myself with various ls options I'd forgotten.
- Nate >>
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html
Reply to: