Re: /boot fs (was Re: /boot partition changes when it should not)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
thib wrote:
> Maybe someone simply has reasons not to put /boot on a separate volume.
> Now I sure agree that it isn't needed in virtually every other cases,
> but would it really hurt?
We are already discussing this in your thread "Single root filesystem
evilness decreasing in 2010? (on workstations)", so no need to bring it
into mine ;)
And no, it wouldn't hurt, and you are welcome to have /boot as a folder
(instead of partition) into your filesystem. Probably many people
already do. Which is why I specifically mentioned in the first post in
this thread that I (possibly unlike most others) use a separate
partition for /boot. The reason being exactly that I (certainly unlike
most others) want to do checksums of it, and that only works if it is a
separate partition.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVra4ACgkQ+VSRxYk440+Z9ACdGlvkfytSGgd88PCzKeYe+AkQ
AXUAoJ4qfhhfqQSqTe76Hae9lU7j27U2
=eC+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: