Re: ed 1.33 install errors
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> In <email@example.com>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>In <20090602133233.GA7026@blitz.hooton>, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>I would argue that another bug is that its not statically
>>We do have busybox-static which provides a statically-linked
>> version of a lot of utilities -- enough to recover from most situations
>> with enough effort.
> In particular, it has a statically-linked 'ed' and 'vi'.
I do not understand why this issue is related with static linking or
dynamic linking, now I'm wondering is it proper for me to add the link
/bin/ed which points to /usr/bin/ed? if not proper, should I remove
the link made by me? (I found that ed was upgrade again today, maybe
to fix the bug)
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
> firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_))
> ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
> http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/