Re: ed 1.33 install errors

[明覺 <shi.minjue@gmail.com>]

I found that today's upgrade of ed removed the link made by me, and
moved ed from /usr/bin to /bin, so I guess that the packager just made
a mistake to put ed into /usr/bin yestoday.

2009/6/3 明覺 <shi.minjue@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> <bss@iguanasuicide.net> wrote:
>> In <[🔎] 200906021043.59937.bss@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>>In <[🔎] 20090602133233.GA7026@blitz.hooton>, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>>I would argue that another bug is that its not statically
>>>>linked.
>>>We do have busybox-static which provides a statically-linked
>>> version of a lot of utilities -- enough to recover from most situations
>>> with enough effort.
>>
>> In particular, it has a statically-linked 'ed' and 'vi'.
> I do not understand why this issue is related with static linking or
> dynamic linking, now I'm wondering is it proper for me to add the link
> /bin/ed which points to /usr/bin/ed? if not proper, should I remove
> the link made by me? (I found that ed was upgrade again today, maybe
> to fix the bug)
> thanks!
>> --
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
>> bss@iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
>> ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
>> http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 不苦不樂正念正智
> Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer)
> Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl
>



-- 
不苦不樂正念正智
Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer)
Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl