* Carl Fink (carlf@panix.com) [19.09.08 21:33]: > > > > A hidden ESSID is *not* standard compliant, so actually noone has to > > care about such situations. I ran into this with my iwl3945. > > There's a difference between "standards compliant" and "common". If we only > cared about standards compliance, we wouldn't support NTFS or Office > formatted documents. Don't blame the messenger, I was just told that. BTW: WiFi *is* a standard, so one should care about it's specs. And this states iirc that the ESSID should *not* be hidden. Sebastian -- " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER mailto:samson@guenther-roetgen.de
Attachment:
pgpDg36IbmLJH.pgp
Description: PGP signature