On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:32 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, John Allen wrote: > > Use XFS, and it won't fsck when you boot :) > > Yeah, instead that stupid idea from SGI [fsck.xfs is a no-op] will require > you to boot from another media to do a periodic xfs_repair on / if you want > to make sure it is a proper xfs and not some corrupted mess that will > eventually crash hard and cause massive data loss. Wow, I really have to wonder what the rationale was behind /that/ design. Seems shortsighted no matter how you try to cut it. > Your / should be small, fsck-friendly, and resilient as all heck. In another words, ext3. -- Paul Johnson baloo@ursine.ca
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part