Re: JFS / Unsupported file systems
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:19:15AM -0500, Hose wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
> [snip]
>>> some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
>> You know I'm not sure. I vaguely recall xfs being really bad with
>> unclean unmounts (moreso than most other filesystems) and it's
>> performance has not kept up with the newer stuff, but I probably should
>> look into again (unless someone says NO IS HORRIBLE!!!!!).
>>
>> I actually use it personally on a few external drives, but nothing
>> extensive.
> I have started to use it for holding large files avi etc, it seems to be
> a lot faster when manipulating these files, deletes etc.
>
> But i do have a ups attached to the machine
>> hose
perhaps i should switch my downloads partition over.
Rich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIFsAHLeTfO4yBSAcRAqHaAJ94yeKRfqRW6Lg0LvBlm2I+HaCPHACgiufs
0gc/LrsSJmjvhXZbcAl3E2U=
=sZkv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: