[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: JFS / Unsupported file systems



On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
>  
> > I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
> > past 5 years as different parts of production systems, and I find both
> > to be fairly reliable, and much less annoying to use than ext{2,3}.
> > Unfortunately I'm not sure where to go from here on out for the
> > future, as JFS *does* seem to be on a dead-end path, and reiser4 isnt
> > even close to being standard (then again, even finding a JFS supported
> > live cd can sometimes be a hassle).  I have a severe dislike for ext,
> > though I haven't looked much at 4.  Anyone have suggestions?  ZFS
> > looks interesting, but I've heard mixed things of it in practice.
> 
> FreeBSD has had ffs2 for a while and OpenBSD is just bringing it into
> the main there (I guess they figure its secure enough now) which solves
> their fs>1TB limitation.  Can Linux rw ffs2?

some reason that xfs is not being talked about?

> 
> Doug.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
"I understand there's a suspicion that we?we're too security-conscience."

	- George W. Bush
04/14/2005
Washington, DC

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: