Re: Source code editor
On 21/04/2008, Joost Witteveen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 21/04/2008, Johann Spies <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Lars Bjerregaard wrote:
> > > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > >> On 16/04/2008, Tero Mäntyvaara <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >>> I installed motor in my AMD64 Etch system and after I execute it I get
> > >>> "Segmentation fault"... :-/
> > >>
> > >> Whoa, etch? You got that on etch? How the hell did such an RC bug get
> > >> into etch? First time I hear about it.
> > I also get a 'Segmentation fault' on a 64-bit system.
> Me too, it needs (at least) the following patch:
Ah, nice patch. I did a stack trace, but I didn't see that. Good
catch. I was looking at the signed/unsigned comparisons that gcc threw
as warnings, but turns out that was a total red herring.
The motor code is rather messy. I was thinking of cleaning it up in
general. Are people using it? If anyone is actually interested in
using it, it might be worthwhile to maintain it.
- Jordi G. H.