Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:42:24 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.64.0709111839080.16438@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46E72597.1060204@cox.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.64.0709100637510.16656@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg> <[🔎] 20070910072602.GA3487@localhost> <[🔎] 46E5064C.5080500@cox.net> <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.64.0709100924170.21324@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg> <[🔎] 46E52892.5040301@cox.net> <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.64.0709111821290.16438@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg> <[🔎] 46E72597.1060204@cox.net>

What I meant was that if postfix had the capability to do smarthostauthentication I didn't know about the syntax for it or where any suchsyntax would have been stored in configuration files.

Reply to:

References:
- exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@iitm.ac.in>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
- Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
Next by Date: Re: Real problem with debian user is NOT spam, but that posts don' t get posted.
Previous by thread: Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
Next by thread: Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread