Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/07 18:23, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time
> didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what
> capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with
> respect to smarthost authentication.
Then what did you mean in your 09/10/07 04:27 comment?
(And remember that top-posting is rude.)
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> Thanks for the exim4 smart host help. I would almost go with postfix
>> except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any
>> encryption for doing authentication on their end.
>
> Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that
> postfix does not support smarthost authentication?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG5yWXS9HxQb37XmcRAqW1AKC1bLsbU6a0deQQtmVXAqBNjcHx7wCfZLfB
mHQIIwULOWutBOB08i4Ab1Y=
=aAwl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: