Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful

[Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>]

I used postfix for a very short time with a smarthost that at that time 
didn't require authentication so had no need to check out what 
capabilities postfix might or might not have had at that time with respect 
to smarthost authentication.



On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > Thanks for the exim4 smart host help.  I would almost go with postfix
> > except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any
> > encryption for doing authentication on their end.
>
> Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that
> postfix does not support smarthost authentication?
>
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA  USA
>
> Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
> Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFG5SiSS9HxQb37XmcRAjMDAKCSlhAnRrqUSFaI4UCV3Jz9ompJswCgyvGx
> hiUqqIja2vXA7RAvOVZYUUY=
> =0tFV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org