Re: exim4 maybe too complex to remain useful
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/07 04:27, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Thanks for the exim4 smart host help. I would almost go with postfix
> except the smart host requires authentication but doesn't support any
> encryption for doing authentication on their end.
Maybe I just haven't had enough coffee, but are you saying that
postfix does not support smarthost authentication?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG5SiSS9HxQb37XmcRAjMDAKCSlhAnRrqUSFaI4UCV3Jz9ompJswCgyvGx
hiUqqIja2vXA7RAvOVZYUUY=
=0tFV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: