Re: Confused about kernel source location
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <email@example.com> wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
the first things it says is " DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area"
because that is where the headers for libc I guess are stored.
What is up here ?
Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing the
symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
this about symlinking? Symlinking what to what ?
Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
When I compile my own kernels, I usually put them in /usr/local/src/ ,
then make a symlink from linux-version to kernel. That way, when a new
kernel comes out i just remove the symlink from the old to the new. I find
it's easier to do it that way when I have to recompile modules, that way
I always point the config to /usr/local/src/kernel . I leave /usr/src
out, because thats where the debian kernel source files will go if I need
to download them and I dont want things to get confused.
8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Techno.