[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.



El jue, 31-05-2007 a las 19:59 +0100, Nic James Ferrier escribió:
> Max Hyre <max@hyre.net> writes:
> 
> >  Watch out for loaded words.  The decision was indeed
> > ``political'' in that it was put up to a vote, but
> > `politics' has negative connotations that I don't think
> > apply here.  Each person voting, whether pro or con, was
> > voting out of principle, not because they'd been bribed, or
> > because they'd been forced to follow the party line.  They
> > were deciding what the party line was to be.
> >
> >    This is politics at its best, and has no connection to
> > the operations of the U.S. legislative or executive
> > branches, which is what the word `political' is loaded with.
> >
> >    Indeed, better coordination in the transition (notably
> > pointing people toward the excised documents) would have
> > been a major improvement.  However, ``because of a political
> > decision'' sounds like something derogatory.  In what sense
> > do you mean for people to understand that phrase?
> 
> Firstly, I disagree that the word 'political' is loaded with
> connections to the US legislative or executive branches; that is a
> parochial view. I am from the UK, why would I make those associations?
> 
> 

Because, you are running out of your own context.
   
  "And I think that is *exactly* like politics elsewhere. I am not
  surprised by that. But I am dissapointed and angry."


> 
> In this instance, Debian the community of developers and package
> maintainers, has made a politicial decision and then taken a mandate
> for action from that which overreaches what should have been done.
> 
> As far as I can see, only a third of the electorate voted. And Debian
> has a very limited electorate; I have been using Debian for 10 years;
> I have contributed help and user conversions - but I don't get a vote.
> 
> What I'm saying is that care should have been taken with the
> decision. It was a sensitive issue and what is being done is not
> sensitive.
> 
> And I think that is *exactly* like politics elsewhere. I am not
> surprised by that. But I am dissapointed and angry.
> 
> 
> 
> It is also interesting that a good number of people have seen nothing
> wrong with the actions as they have been taken and I get taken to task
> for bringing it up. That looks a lot like normal politics to me.
> 
> -- 
> Nic Ferrier
> http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   
> 
> 



Reply to: