Re: fluxbox slit
On 2007-05-11, Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand. Fluxbox comes with a well-written and detailed
>> manpage. Would you rather it didn't, or did you mean to say it's too
>> bad the documentation *isn't* included with fluxbox? Which suggests
>> maybe you didn't realise the man page was there...
>
> I read the fluxbox man page and it wasn't clear what this slit-thing
> was. Why wasn't the documentation that's available on-line included
> with the package?
>
I didn't realise the online docbook was as good as it is! I see that
someone has already reported the missing docs as a bug
report/wishlist. Unfortunately, that particular bug is over 2 years
old, so the maintainers don't seem too worried about it.
Tyler
Reply to: