Re: Bug in acroread?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug in acroread?
From: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <kamaraju@bluebottle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:32:01 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] et6jl1$34c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] tkrat.2cb7ef8ab0ca690d@wadsworth.org> <[🔎] 45F1C4F8.9020900@orange.nl> <[🔎] 45F1D4BE.2090802@sbcglobal.net> <[🔎] 45F25FCE.1060609@orange.nl> <[🔎] 45F59022.4040503@sbcglobal.net> <[🔎] 45F59C15.1020706@orange.nl> <[🔎] 45F68269.1060301@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 45F6902D.4020401@orange.nl>

Joe Hart wrote:

> Is postscript so bad that everyone needs pdf?  No.  The fact that PDF
> files are hard to edit is what makes them so popular in the business
> world.
> 

pdf files are searchable. I cannot figure out how to search a .ps file under
gv. The search functionality is tremendously useful when reading a 300 page
book on the computer. This is the main reason I prefer pdf to ps. This is
the reason I sometimes go back to acroread from kpdf (kpdf's search
functionalities are not as great as acroread).

raju

-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Bug in acroread?
  - From: judd@wadsworth.org
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
- Re: Bug in acroread?
  - From: Joe Hart <j.hart@orange.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in acroread?
Next by Date: Re: Iceweasel and Iceweasel-dbg
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in acroread?
Next by thread: Re: Bug in acroread?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread