Re: Introduction
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:58:59 -0500
"Leonid Grinberg" <lgrinberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that I am entering this discussion somewhat late, but I wanted
> to provide my two cents.
[snip]
> I started off with Debian. It was a great system, but it had some
> problems, especially on laptops. The two biggest problems I found were
> lack of ACPI (no hibernation or sleep) and lack of wireless support.
> After installing Ubuntu, both of these problems were fixed.
Debian Sid has ACPI support. Is Ubnutu's better or more reliable?
Which wireless wasn't supported in Debian?
> Ubuntu also seems to be easier to use because it has more GUI
> frontends to programs. In general, I think that for people who either
Which GUIs aren't available in Debian?
> do not know how or do not want to deal with configuring (often
> non-standard) hardware, Ubuntu is a better choice. However, for
> sysadmins, especially on servers, Debian has always proven to me that
> it is *much* better.
>
> Again, just my two cents.
--
ssuds.sourceforge.net - Home of Ssuds and Ssudg, a Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: