Re: where is the bash documentation in info format ?

[John C <zcar@satx.rr.com>]

John Hasler wrote:
> John C writes:
> > By the way several users have stated that it's not about DRM. That may very
> > well be true, but I have still not found anything that confirmed that
> > Debian has accepted and/or found that the DRM restrictions did not
> > apply.
>
> As I understand it GFDL documents with no "invariant sections", no "front
> cover texts" and no "back cover texts" are DFSG-compliant.  IIRC GFDL
> documents with these optional features but with permission to delete them
> are also DFSG-compliant.
>
> I don't know what you mean by "...I have still not found anything that
> confirmed that Debian has accepted and/or found that the DRM restrictions
> did not apply."


It meant that I was still unsure if the Section 2 restriction on 
distributing copies on DRM-protected software was still a problem.

After re-reading the link sent to me by Andrew Saunders covering 
the vote on that section - I understand that that section of the 
GFDL was voted as being in compliance with the DFSG.

Thank you again Andrew, I had misread it the first time.

John