On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:49 -0600, John C wrote: > I'm certainly not a lawer, but it seems to this layman that if a > reference to the Free Software Foundation and it's licensing > under the GFDL is cause enough to move a package to non-free in > order to protect the use of DRM media, there is something > seriously wrong with the process. > > Debian is and has been my distribution for many years primarially > because it is (was?) the most *GNU* distribution available. Is it possible to be a Debian user and not having heard about all the fuss surrounding the GFDL? ;-) http://wiki.debian.org/GFDLPositionStatement -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part