Re: xorg , xfree86?
Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
>> > One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
>> > XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
>> > could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to XFree86 development
>> > being harder than Xorg. To me this is a differnce, a major difference,
>> > regardless which version of Xorg has it.
>> oh. Then we'll expect to see some significant X development from _you_ in
>> the near future, demonstrating that your comment was informed.
> Hehe. Only on a free software list could someone ask an individual
> to backup their opinion by producing improvements to a mammoth project
> like Xorg/Freedesktop :-) The best I can do is send some pennies to the X =
> strike
not in the least. I noted your comment, and could only interpret it in one of
two ways (a lie such as we often see on slashdot, or a promise that since now
that things were being done the way you wanted, you'd start to produce
something).
looking forward to your contribution...
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
Reply to: