Re: xorg , xfree86?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xorg , xfree86?
From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:03:01 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 12ksrd5ljgfqse4@corp.supernews.com>
References: <[🔎] 4fe4c4f50611041538h4a03c3d4if1be1e0f230628fc@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20061105000028.GA2330@big.lan.gnu> <[🔎] 20061105020816.GA32380@localhost> <[🔎] 454DB967.2070002@noctus.net> <[🔎] 20061105180338.GA13218@localhost>

Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:

> One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
> XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
> could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to XFree86 development
> being harder than Xorg. To me this is a differnce, a major difference,
> regardless which version of Xorg has it.

oh.  Then we'll expect to see some significant X development from _you_ in
the near future, demonstrating that your comment was informed.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xorg , xfree86?
  - From: Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net>

References:
- xorg , xfree86?
  - From: ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com>
- Re: xorg , xfree86?
  - From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
- Re: xorg , xfree86?
  - From: Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net>
- Re: xorg , xfree86?
  - From: Mathias Brodala <info@noctus.net>
- Re: xorg , xfree86?
  - From: Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net>

Prev by Date: Re: dbus and the bus address
Next by Date: Re: xorg - nv driver
Previous by thread: Re: xorg , xfree86?
Next by thread: Re: xorg , xfree86?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread