[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xorg , xfree86?



On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> > One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in
> > XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never
> > could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to XFree86 development
> > being harder than Xorg. To me this is a differnce, a major difference,
> > regardless which version of Xorg has it.
> 
> oh.  Then we'll expect to see some significant X development from _you_ in
> the near future, demonstrating that your comment was informed.

 Hehe. Only on a free software list could someone ask an individual
 to backup their opinion by producing improvements to a mammoth project
 like Xorg/Freedesktop :-) The best I can do is send some pennies to the X strike
 force. :=) Arent you involved with Xterm? Can I conclude that _you_
 dont see any benefit in your work.
 cheers,
 Kev
-- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:       |
| : :' :      The  Universal     | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656   |
|     my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   |     my NPO: cfsg.org     |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: