Re: Social Contract

[hendrik@topoi.pooq.com]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:34:29PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > Nice way to avoid the point. 
> 
>     Nope, didn't avoid a thing.  As you admit your case was constructed.
> Furthermore it did not address what I said.
> 
> > You said, and I quote:
> >>> The short, short form is that EICs are issued for people being 
> >>> irresponsible (like, having kids while well below the poverty level),
> 
>     Your constructed example was that someone who had kids *then* lost their
> job.  My case is the more common no job or single, low wage job, have a kid
> because the nanny state will take care of it or they can't figure out how the
> darn things are made.  That's two completely different cases.

Which is an argument for haveing a free public school system that 
teaches responsible sexual conduct.
Also an agument for free abortion.
Also an argument for not getting raped.

-- hendrik