[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN



On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 05:15:06PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 April 2006 14:14, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >   
> >> Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Well, debian is pretty obvious about its purpose.  It's a link right
> >>> from the front page.  Maybe people should be choosing other distros if
> >>> they don't like bullet item number one of the social contract.  Debian
> >>> without the social contract would be just another distro.  In other
> >>> words, there would be no point to using debian without the contract.
> >>>       
> >>     Funny, the #1 point for most people is apt, not the social contract. 
> >> #1 for *you* maybe.
> >>     
> > Include my name in the list of "people for whom socila contract is the #1
> > point". I use debian because of its commitment to free software (which is part
> > of social contract) not because it has apt or some other cool software.
> >
> > raju
> >   
> 
> Include my name in the list of "people for whom social contract is the
> #1 point" also. When Debian ceases to be Free, then Debian ceases to
> retain my loyalty.
> 
> -- 
> Kent


1 more here.

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: