Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 14:14, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
>> Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
>>
>>> Well, debian is pretty obvious about its purpose. It's a link right
>>> from the front page. Maybe people should be choosing other distros if
>>> they don't like bullet item number one of the social contract. Debian
>>> without the social contract would be just another distro. In other
>>> words, there would be no point to using debian without the contract.
>>>
>> Funny, the #1 point for most people is apt, not the social contract.
>> #1 for *you* maybe.
>>
> Include my name in the list of "people for whom socila contract is the #1
> point". I use debian because of its commitment to free software (which is part
> of social contract) not because it has apt or some other cool software.
>
> raju
>
Include my name in the list of "people for whom social contract is the
#1 point" also. When Debian ceases to be Free, then Debian ceases to
retain my loyalty.
--
Kent
Reply to: