[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fstab problem

I don't think this came up in the thread, but does it show up in dmesg at all? It should theoritcally show up a the same time as all the other disks

Posting relevant portion of dmesg below... It seems it finds hdc ok. But maybe not in time before it runs fsck maybe?


cpqarray: Finding drives on ida1 (Smart Array 3200)
cpqarray ida/c1d0: blksz=512 nr_blks=17764320
/dev/ida/c1d0: p1 p2 < p5 > p3
kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Adding 399816k swap on /dev/ida/c1d0p5.  Priority:-1 extents:1
EXT3 FS on ida/c1d0p1, internal journal
Generic RTC Driver v1.07
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
hda: CD-224E, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hda: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM drive, 512kB Cache
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Capability LSM initialized
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.18
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xc3fff000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:50:8B:D9:38:9D
SiI680: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:03:06.0
SiI680: chipset revision 2
SiI680: BASE CLOCK == 133
SiI680: 100% native mode on irq 5
   ide1: MMIO-DMA , BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
   ide2: MMIO-DMA , BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
hdc: WDC WD2500JB-00KFA0, ATA DISK drive
ide1 at 0xf8843f80-0xf8843f87,0xf8843f8a on irq 5
hdc: max request size: 64KiB
hdc: 488397168 sectors (250059 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=30401/255/63, UDMA(100)
/dev/ide/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: p1
SCSI subsystem initialized

It now works reliably with mount -a so I finally put a startup script
with nothing but mount -a in it.

Course, the problem with that is I can't let the system do a fsck on it
at boot up because the machine does't seem to see the drive util
later..   ??

so put a fsck in your script?

Umm, I can't do that because "I" didn't think of it!    haha  :)

Reply to: