[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Easy Debian Wireless 101



* Robert D. Crawford <rdc1x@comcast.net> [2005 Oct 26 06:28 -0500]:
> "Michael Perry" <mperry@lnxpowered.org> writes:
> 
> > Steve Lamb wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone have any recommendations for the
> >> simplest card to get working with Debian?  
> 
> > I think the easiest I have ever done is a orinoco pci adaptor with a
> > gold 11b card in it.  
> 
> I am not sure if it is an issue with the gold card, or if it affects the
> pci version of the cards, but the orinoco name was attached to several
> cards.  This seems not to be a problem until Proxim started making them
> and came out with Rev.4.  This one had an Agere chipset that has no
> support from the in-kernel drivers.  There is _supposedly_ one driver
> that can be downloaded from Agere for the 2.4.x kernels, but I could not
> compile it.  Stay the hell away from the proxim cards.

So far I've had good luck with two different Atheros based adapters and
the Madwifi driver.  The first I bought a year ago is a Linksys WPC55AG
an a/b/g capable PCMCIA card.  The second is the built in adapter on
an IBM Thinkpad T42.  

I build the Madwifi driver against the kernel source configured with the 
Debian kernel config file and the driver loads into the stock Debian
kernel with no problems.  I generally follow the instructions at:

http://www.marlow.dk/site.php/tech/madwifi

The only problem I've encountered is here at home with a Linksys
BEFW11S AP and WEP.  It seems that the wireless tools commands need to
be fed in a certain order that I found through experimentation.  Tools
like Kwifimanager don't seem to be able to negotiate the key so I rely
on waproamd and a customized script here at home.  On the road with an
open AP (hotel, etc.) Kwifimanager works fine.

If you need a 100% DSFG driver, then an Atheros based card is probably
not for you as Madwifi is built around a proprietary firmware blob that
is loaded by the driver.  I don't really see it as a problem because it
isn't much different than if the blob were burned into the card.  The
difference here is that the blob can be improved upstream and new
features/bug fixes can be applied without having to flash the
card--always a somewhat chancy proposition.  And the blob approach is
pretty much required per FCC regulations on 802.11 devices.

Madwifi works well with Kismet which is an added bonus.

- Nate >>

-- 
 Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB          |  Successfully Microsoft
  Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @  | free since January 1998.
             http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/           |  "Debian, the choice of
             My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @            |     a GNU generation!"
        http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/       |   http://www.debian.org



Reply to: