On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote: > > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people will > > dislike the extra overhead, and maybe find it hard to read. Do most clients > > display GPG signatures nicely now? > > > Pretty much. And since most now do S/MIME and PGP/MIME instead of the > old ASCII inline, if they don't it shows up as some random attachment, > instead of a bunch of crap at the top and bottom of a message. The problem is that you can't use it universally because there are still way too many people using M$ products which simply don't display any body for messages that are pgp/mime signed. Unfortunately these people tend to be bosses, elderly family members, Etc. so you have to make an effort to exclude them from receiving pgp/mime signed messages. Still it's nice to have the if it ain't signed it ain't mine explanation. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t@tomass.dyndns.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature