Top posting considered harmful. http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting On Thursday June 9 2005 4:22 pm, John Carline wrote: > But, it would make my reading/following of threads much easier if I > didn't have to scroll down to the bottom of post after post in a > long string just to read the one line added to the 200 I've already > read. Part of proper quoting is removing the parts that you're *not* responding to. Failing to remove irrelevant text is a function of poor netiquette encouraged by top posting. Search Google Groups and observe how people very rarely included the entire prior post or top posted before Microsoft's top-post-by-default clients hit the net. -- Paul Johnson Email and Instant Messenger (Jabber): baloo@ursine.ca http://ursine.ca/~baloo/
Attachment:
pgp39UhZcdbEN.pgp
Description: PGP signature