Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x
On 01/30/2005 11:15 am, Robert Vangel wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Also, I have read reports that 2.6 does not play well with Samba.
> > Intermittent file corruptions. Since this box will be a file
> > server, this would be something to google/investigate further.
>
> My file server at home (sarge) runs vanilla 2.6.10 and I haven't
> *noticed* any problems. That said, the box isn't constantely being
> accessed or driven to extremes of use, but it does get it's fair share
> of Samba access.
I have 2.6.8 on one machine running Debian testing and 2.6.9 on another
machine running Xandros 3 (Xandros is Debian-based) and I have not had
problems with Samba, the only problem I have had is that I cannot compile
kernels newer than 2.6.8 because of something that is broken and was to be
removed from newer kernels, "gamma drm" I believe it is called.
8)
sp@mtr@p: croak@shadypond.com
Reply to: