Re: ATI Radeon 9200 / 9600 on a 2.6.x kernel
It is the same:
[19:03:35] reykjavik (grajea01) (~) : uname -a
SunOS reykjavik.dnsalias.net 5.9 Generic_112233-12 sun4m sparc
SUNW,SPARCstation-5
[19:03:37] reykjavik (grajea01) (~) :
I don't know all the historical details, but up to 2.6 the OS could be
called SunOS 2.5.x. After that it was SunOS 5.6 (the major version #
jumped 3 notches).
Then much later (I might be wrong a bit) you could call it either SunOS
5.6 or Solaris 6, SunOS 5.7 or Solaris 8... SunOS 5.10 / Solaris 10.
Again, I might be wrong on the specifics, as I started using Solaris at
version 7. Nowadays my OS of choice is SunOS 5.9 as most of the servers
I manage are on that platform/version.
Jeff
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:51 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:53 -0500, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> > Well nothing really out of ordinary, I think, with grub and lilo, as you
> > know.
> >
> > So basically I run Solaris 10 (build 72 now) for Intel (dev
> > environment), XP (fooling around), Linux (main system).
>
> I thought SunOS was killed 12 years ago.
>
> > To make it a bit worse: on linux I run VMWare so there I can also run
> > SunOS 5.9 and XP, albeit simultaneously this time.
>
> Or is SunOS 5.9 the same as Solaris 9 ?
>
> > Another computer runs Fedora Core 3 and SunOS 5.9 (dual boot) with a W2K
> > in VMWare.
> >
> > Next smart step would be to configure a dhcp daemon but heck, I'm lazy
> > and don't find the time to do that :)
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:09 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:13 -0500, J.F.Gratton wrote:
> > > > Elimar, Roberto, Danke/gracias.
> > > >
> > > > I don't plan on gaming much on Linux, it's more my development
> > > > environment than anything else. I do play some games on XP (the machine
> > > > triple-boots Linux/XP/SunOS). If worse comes to worse, I still have the
> > >
> > > That's quite a trick...
> > >
> >
> >
>
Reply to: