In what way does "ubuntu.org" have a terrorist agenda?
<sillyness>I mean dude, they use like a hippie name and they live in the country "africa". How can they not be terrorist-supporting weed smoking lefties?
</sillyness>
Well, I seem to remember that Bush said something like "If you're not with us, you're against us". It's stupid, but it's very clear.Or does pacifist equate to terrorist in your dictionary?
If you can demonstrate that it _does_ genuinely have a terrorist or militant agenda, I'll stand corrected.
<sillyness>Come on man! They use the word _ubuntu_ for their linux distro! They must be terrorists! They should change to something more sensible and _truly_ pacifist such as 'HolySword' or something.
Here's a few dangerous terrorist idea inducing names to avoid: PeaceAndLove GreenPeace RedCross </sillyness>
France isn't either. The only thing that keeps our president out of prison is that he is, well, our president :-(.<rant> "Terrorist" has become such a bull-shit word. The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium "dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, with your arms-companies selling land-mines to anyone who wants one, with your "oil before people" capitalist mentality, with your "shock and awe" tactics and your moronic amoral president, with your consumerism and obesity in a world where people are starving, with your "our lifestyle is more important than your life" mentality. Take a good look at your own country's agenda. Australia is not much better.
<troll>But a thief is still preferable to a murderer...</troll>
I doubt that the name Ubuntu Linux was chosen in order to associate the product with the politics of ubuntu.org, but if it was, good on them for supporting an organization that (as far as I can see) promotes international peace.
I agree.