Debian sarge and production servers is it ready on 12/26/2004?
Tim said:
> If you think testing or unstable is suitable for production systems you are
> one of
>
> 1. an idiot
> 2. have very limited needs/no experience
> 3. talking out of your ass
> 4. have no concept of what it means to be responsible for others' work
Even Sarge? I need something more up to date then woody, for my postgresql and
need the integration that sarge provides, vs backports + woody. Is Sarge that
dangerous on 12/26/2004? I want others opinions. I have 2 servers running
sarge 24/7 right now (for last 3 weeks.... just installed).
Mitchell
>
> I am getting really sick of people pushing sid for production use. Please
> stop doing it. I don't really care if it meets your needs. If it does, you
> are a tiny minority; your experience with it in this capacity is anecdotal,
> and none of it is likely to have any bearing on anyone else's needs.
>
> --
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
> ( t | i | m | @ | i | t | . | k | p | t | . | c | c )
> \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
> GPG key fingerprint = 1DEE CD9B 4808 F608 FBBF DC21 2807 D7D3 09CA 85BF
Reply to: