Re: Bogus reply-to
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:09:03AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:54:10PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > So use one that does. What is your point?
>
> Why the hell should you have to change MUAs just to satify a pithy
> means to automate a task you should also do manually anyway, and
> that is edit/check the headers before sending.
>
> Switching to using a different MUA is a ridiculous suggestion.
What? Demanding the world accommodates you, your underpowered mail
setup, and your unwillingness to fix your setup despite numerous mails
giving solutions that work is far more ridiculous.
['You' not being specific to any particular person.]
--
You win again, gravity!
Reply to: