Re: Bogus reply-to
On Aug 08, 11:22, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> On 2004-08-09, Tim Connors penned:
> > What I am saying, is all of these discussion lists have differnt
> > policies. It's kind of silly expecting people to remember which
> > policy belongs to which list, and blasting people when they get it
> > wrong.
> My understanding is that gmane translates my Mail-Copies-To: never into
> the appropriate mail followup header. I've asked a couple of times if
> this is working, and no one has said anything to me, so I assume it is.
> In fact:
> # Mail-copies-to: never
> # Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Aren't these the vaunted headers? And yet, I get cc'd, or directly
> emailed, all the time. Either people's clients or broken, or they are.
> Either way, the headers don't work. Not reliably.
I use mutt, if I press 'r' to reply I get offered the following address
Reply to email@example.com? ([yes]/no):
If I refuse I get offered your bounce address, neither of which are good
If I press 'g' to reply I get the list, which sort of makes sense but is
not particularily intuitive IMHO.
Any frontal attack on ignorance is bound to fail because the masses are
always ready to defend their most precious possession -- their ignorance.
--Hendrik Van Loon (1882-1944)