"Monique Y. Mudama" <spam@bounceswoosh.org> writes: > On 2004-07-12, Steve Lamb penned: >> >> I'm not sure what Karsten had in mind here but let me give my >> first hand view on this piece. My current employment gives me >> access to TMDA in production use. In one instance a client of >> ours gets over 9,000 messages *a day*. Virtually all of it is >> spam. They have configured TMDA to C-R. So follow the math. > > Implementing a C/R system without first running the mail through some > spam detection system is horribly irresponsible. So false positives will never be able to get a challenge, right? Though if you're going to go through the trouble of doing spam filtering at SMTP-time, that defeats the supposed purpose of TMDA to begin with. You're on the right track, but you should have just said, "Implementing a C/R system is horribly irresponsible," and left it at that. Besides, why should anybody have to subscribe to *send* you mail?
Attachment:
pgpKN500naRM_.pgp
Description: PGP signature