Re: ccing

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ccing
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 00:06:31 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k6yddzm0.fsf@ursine.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.60.0406111413520.18154@maranatha.charter.net> (Cheryl Homiak's message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:17:05 -0500 (CDT)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.60.0406111311520.15569@maranatha.charter.net> <[🔎] 40CA001E.1070805@ninkendo.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.60.0406111413520.18154@maranatha.charter.net>

Cheryl Homiak <chomiak@charter.net> writes:

> I have my configuration set to use "reply-to"; maybe that's
> wrong.

Well-maintained mailing lists do *not* add a Reply-To: header (it's a
user-set header, servers should not be changing it any more than it
should be changing From: or Subject:).

-- 
Paul Johnson
<baloo@ursine.ca>
Linux.  You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.

Reply to:

References:
- ccing
  - From: Cheryl Homiak <chomiak@charter.net>
- Re: ccing
  - From: Ken Simon <ken@ninkendo.org>
- Re: ccing
  - From: Cheryl Homiak <chomiak@charter.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Compile kernel on sid -> dependency problem on woody
Next by Date: Re: ssh delays and drops
Previous by thread: Re: ccing
Next by thread: Re: ccing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread