Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net> writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> Uwe Dippel <udippel@uniten.edu.my> writes:
> >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far
> >> > so good.
> >>
> >> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
> >> lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
> >
> > Don't be. It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a
> > single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications
> > other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
>
> Ah, that must be it, then. I like k3b. Not as nice as cdbakeoven,
> but cdbakeoven isn't in sid last I checked.
>
> --
> Paul Johnson
> <baloo@ursine.ca>
> Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
> > other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
I like it.
Reply to: